|
摘要：
|
|
通过单向拉伸试验获得了LF2M(Φ75 mm×1.5 mm)和LF21M(Φ27 mm×1 mm)两种铝合金管材的基本力学性能。研究了不同数学模型对材料应变硬化曲线的描述能力,发现采用幂函数对LF2M管材试验数据拟合较好,指数函数对LF21M管材试验数据拟合较好;基于单向拉伸试验获得了两种铝合金管材的塑性应变比。为上述两种试验铝合金管材的塑性成形分析提供了实用的材料模型。
|
|
Basic material properties of aluminium alloy tubes of LF2M(Φ75 mm×1.5 mm) and LF21M(Φ27 mm×1 mm) were obtained using uniaxial tensile test.Strain hardening curves fitted using different mathematic models and curves obtained by the uniaxial tensile test were compared.The results show that power function is accurate for LF2M tube,while exponent function is appropriate for LF21M tube.Plastic strain ratios for the above tubes were acquired based on uniaxial tensile test.The research provides a practical material model for the forming of LF2M and LF21M aluminum alloy tubes.
|
|
基金项目：
|
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目(50905144)
|
|
作者简介：
|
|
|
|
参考文献：
|
[1]杨合,林艳,孙志超.面向21世纪的先进塑性加工技术与管成形研究发展[A].周光召.中国科学协会第二届学术年会文集[C].北京:科学技术出版社,2000.
[2]彭志辉,甘卫平.汽车工业用铝材的开发与应用[J].汽车工艺与材料,1999,(4):1-6.
[3]Paulsen F,Welo T.Cross-sectional deformations of rectangu-lar hollow sections in bending:Part I-Experiments[J].Inter-national Journal of Mechanical Sciences,2001,43(1):109-129.
[4]郭小农,沈祖炎,李元齐,等.国产结构用铝合金材料本构关系及物理力学性能研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007,28(6):110-117.
[5]GB/T 228-2002.金属材料室温拉伸试验方法[S].
[6]吴建军.板料成形性基础[M].西安:西北工业大学出版社,2004.
[7]倪洪启,刘相华,王国栋.超级钢板材冲压性能的试验研究[J].锻压技术,2006,31(3):23-25.
[8]李赛毅,张新明,陈志永.应变水平对铝镇静钢板塑性应变比的影响[J].钢铁研究学报,1996,8(5):48-51.
[9]谭新常,黄义宏,刘树祯.关于塑性应变比的测定[J].金属成形工艺,1994,12(5):82-88.
[10]GB/T 5027-1999.金属薄板和薄带塑性应变比(r值)试验方法[S].
|
|
服务与反馈：
|
|
【本网站尚未开通全文下载服务】【加入收藏】
|
|
|
|
